On scientific approaches to the development of experimental eurasian institutional models of innovative infrastructure in the Donetsk People's Republic
Keywords:
Western institutional models of innovation infrastructure, methodological individualism, Western model of economic man, methodological holism, basic model of personality and traditional basic ethical principles of the Russian-Eurasian civilization, Eurasian institutional models of innovation infrastructureAbstract
The subject of the study was the causes of the dysfunctionality of imported institutional models of innovation infrastructure, as well as scientific approaches to the development of Eurasian institutional models. The relevance of the study is determined by the need for import substitution of Western catch-up institutional models of innovation infrastructure, which in the Russian context do not have a significant impact on the innovative development of the industrial sector. The study was conducted based on an interdisciplinary approach - from the perspective of the cultural-historical concept of civilization, neo-institutional concept, and the concept of phenomenological sociology. One of the main reasons for the dysfunctionality of imported institutions of innovation infrastructure is the principle of methodological individualism, on the basis of which they are constructed. This principle is inherent in the Western model of economic man, oriented towards the basic personality model of Western civilization of the Modern era. Russian economists and entrepreneurs are searching for an alternative model of economic man, but a generally accepted understanding of it is not yet available. Of particular interest is the empathic model of economic man used by the Russian company EFKO. Its essential characteristic is the principles of methodological holism inherent in the basic personality model of the Russian-Eurasian civilization. The norms and rules of the institutional models created within the company, linked to the traditional core values of the basic personality model of the Russian-Eurasian civilization, motivate the innovative behavior of its entrepreneurial leaders. Without reorganizing Western institutional models in the sphere of industrial innovation infrastructure (as in other spheres), engaging the traditional core values of the Russian-Eurasian civilization in reproductive activity is impossible. These values, transmitted by the sociocultural code of the Russian-Eurasian civilization, not fully explicated by scientific methods, can be represented as traditional basic ethical principles. Guided by these values, from the perspective of holistic methodology, it is advisable to develop experimental Eurasian institutional models of industrial innovation infrastructure in the Donetsk People’s Republic.
Downloads
References
Avtonomov V.S. (2014). A Few More Words about Methodological Individualism. Social Sciences and Modernity, 3, 53-56. [In Russian]
Bagdasaryan I.S., Mironova E.S. (2017). Import of Institutions in the Russian Economy. Postulate, 2, 387-402. [In Russian]
Bodrunov S.D. (2021). From Homo Economicus to Homo Sapiens. Questions of Philosophy, 12, 18-31. [In Russian]
Bodrunov S.D. (2022). From Economic Interests to Noovalues. Questions of Philosophy, 7, 15-26. [In Russian]
Vasilyeva E.A. (2015). Value-Oriented Transformation of Social Institutions: Managerial Aspect. Humanitarian, Socio-Economic and Social Sciences, 10-1, 46-49. [In Russian]
Velichko A.M. (1999). State Ideals of Russia and the West. Parallels of Legal Cultures. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Law Institute. [In Russian]
Vernikov A.V., Kurysheva A.A. (2024). Is It True That National Economic Traditions Hinder Development? (institutional approach). Economic revival of Russia, 2 (80), 122-140. [In Russian]
Volovodova E.V., Bidenko T.V. (2023). On the basic values of the Russian-Eurasian civilization and their involvement in the processes of socio-economic development of the DPR. Vestnik of Institute of Economic Research, 2 (30), 30-46. [In Russian]
Volovodova E.V., Bidenko T.V. (2024). Basic values of the Russian-Eurasian civilization - strategic resources for denazification-de-westernization of the population of the liberated territories of Ukraine. Challenges of modernity and strategies for the development of society in the context of the new reality (code-MKVSS): Collection of materials of the XXIX International scientific and practical conference. Moscow: Center for the Development of Education and Science. [In Russian] https://doi.org/10.26118/9831.2024.31.18.062
Glazyev S. Yu. (2022). Noonomics as a paradigm of managing the new world economic order. Noonomics and noo-society. Almanac of works of the Institute of Industrial Research named after S. Yu. Witte, 3, 48-58. [In Russian]
Glazyev S.Yu. (2023). Prospects for Russia's Development on the Long Wave of Growth of the New Technological Order. Economic Revival of Russia, 2 (76), 27-32. [In Russian]
Glazyev S.Yu., Kosakyan D.L. (2024). State and Prospects of Formation of the 6th Technological Order in the Russian Economy. Economic Sciences, 10 (2), 11-29. [In Russian]
Golodnyuk R.A. (2023). Industrial Policy: Formation and Implementation in the Context of Reindustrialization of the Economy: monograph. Krasnodar: Novation. [In Russian]
Dezhina I.G. (2020). Scientific "centers of excellence" in Russian universities: changing models. ECO, 4 (550), 87-109. [In Russian]
Disperova N.A. (2016). Motivation as a way to manage the innovation process in industry. Problems of Economics and Legal Practice, 6, 160-163. [In Russian]
Dubrovskaya N.V. (2016). Evolutionary and institutional analysis of clustering of the domestic economy. Bulletin of PNRPU. Social and Economic Sciences, 4, 172-180. [In Russian]
Dugin A.G. (2024). Western Studies: Towards a Sovereign Russian Science. Bulletin of the State University of Education. Series: Historical and Political Sciences, 3, 7-21. [In Russian]
Bishop Kallistos of Diokleia. (2007). Understanding Salvation in the Orthodox Tradition. The Doctrine of Salvation in Different Christian Confessions. Moscow: Biblical and Theological Institute of St. Andrew the Apostle. [In Russian]
Zhdanov D.A. (2014). Economic man - views and approaches. Journal of Economic Theory, 3, 106-114. [In Russian]
Islamutdinov V.F. (2014). The essence and classification of the institutional environment of innovative activity. Journal of Institutional Studies, 2, 79-90. [In Russian]
Kapelyushnikov R.I. (2020). Who is Homo oeconomicus?. Economic Policy, 1, 8-39. [In Russian]
Kapoguzov E.A., Levin S.N., Sablin K.S. (2019). What is meant by the import of institutions?. Journal of Economic Theory, 16 (3), 480-487. [In Russian]
Kara-Murza S.G. (2011). Russia and the West: Paradigms of Civilization. Moscow: Academic Project; Culture. [In Russian]
Kirdina S.G., Pavlenko Yu.G. (2014). Methodological Individualism and Holism: Features of Interdisciplinary Research. Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 3, 34-44. [In Russian]
Koveshnikov V.S. (2022). Experimental Economics and its Practical Application. Economic Sciences, 37. [In Russian] http://novaum.ru/public/p2458
Kolesnichenko Yu.V. (2008). Personality in Eurasianism. Epistemological Foundations. Moscow: Alfa-M. [In Russian]
Kurbatova M.V., Levin S.N., Sablin K.S. (2020). "Triple Failure" of Institutional Design in Reforming Higher Education in Russia. Journal of Institutional Studies, 12 (4), 94-111. [In Russian]
Lenchuk E.B. (2014). Formation of the Institutional Environment for Industrial Development in the Context of Import Substitution. Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 6, 7-20. [In Russian]
Lesnykh V.V., Popov E.V. (2008). A Systems Approach to the Problem of Importing Institutions into the Russian Economy. Bulletin of USTU-UPI, 2, 4-21. [In Russian]
Lozina O.M., Tutov L.A. (2020). Methodological prerequisites of the human model in the modern economy. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 6. Economy, 5, 24-39. [In Russian]
Makarov I. N., Pochepaev I. A., Sotnikov N. B. (2022). Institutional basis for the formation and functioning of industrial-institutional policy. Issues of innovation economics, 3, 1399-1408. [In Russian]
Malchin V.A. (2007). Import of institutions and criteria for assessing its effectiveness. Actual problems of economics and law, 1, 31-36. [In Russian]
Martin-Ioganson E. (2023). Russia and the West: confrontation of civilizations. National ideology as a necessary condition for the unification of Russia. Sovereign Russia in the rebellious reality: economy, technology, culture. Rostov-on-Don: Donskoy Publishing House. [In Russian]
Miroshnichenko N.V. (2011). Theoretical aspects of institutional management in the new economy. Industry: economics, management, technology, 4, 32-35. [In Russian]
Monastyrny E.A. (2016). Evaluation of innovation processes. Study guide. Tomsk.: Tomsk Polytechnic University. [In Russian]
Motyshina M.S., Bolshakov A.S., Mikhailov V.I. (2009). Management in socio-cultural services and tourism: study guide. Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix. [In Russian]
North D. (1997). Institutions, institutional changes and the functioning of the economy. Moscow: Fund of the economic book "Beginnings".[In Russian]
Podberezsky I.V. (2002). The Adventures of Democracy in the East. East-West-Russia. Moscow: Progress-Tradition. [In Russian]
Polterovich V.M. (2011). Formation of General Social Analysis. Social Sciences and Modernity, 2, 101-111. [In Russian]
Popov A.I. (2015). On the Relationship between Western and Eurasian Types of Economic Man. PSE, 4 (56), 67-69. [In Russian]
Rashkovsky E.B., Khoros V.G. (2002). World civilizations and modernity (towards the methodology of analysis). East-West-Russia. Moscow: Progress-Tradition. [In Russian]
Rogozhnikova V.N. (2019). Prospects for the development of the human model in modern economic theory. Revolution and evolution: development models in science, culture and society. Proceedings of the II All-Russian scientific conference. Nizhny Novgorod: Krasnaya Lastochka. [In Russian]
Romanov E.V. (2023). Value foundations of the strategy of economic development of Russia. Economic Revival of Russia, 3, 119-138. [In Russian]
Rostova N.N., Osipov Yu.M., Bugayan I.R., Zotova E.S. (eds.). (2023). On the Intellectual Sovereignty of Russia in the Rebellious Reality: Economy, Technology, Culture. Rostov-on-Don: Donskoy Publishing House. [In Russian]
Saklakov V.M., Monastyrny E.A., Pavlova I.A. (2017). Borrowing of Non-Financial Institutions on the Example of Innovative Infrastructure of the Tomsk Region. Innovations, 3 (221), 64-71. [In Russian]
Serebryakov A.A. (2021). Review of the strategic leadership program "Priority-2030". Science Management: Theory and Practice, 3, 236-241. [In Russian]
Staniloae Dumitru, Archpriest. (2013). The Unity of Man with Nature. Living Spring, 12, 30-32. [In Russian]
Titova E.I. (2020). Model of behavior of a Russian person in the economic sphere of modern Russian society. Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series “Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy”, 2, 117-121. [In Russian]
Tishchenko T.V. (2019). Analysis of the activities of Russian development institutions to stimulate innovation. Creative Economy, 1, 105-114. [In Russian]
Trifonov E.V. (2016). Models of an economic and creative person. Creative Economy, 6, 625-636. [In Russian]
Trotsenko O.S. (2018). Models of Implementation of Public-Private Partnerships in Russia and Foreign Countries. Education and Law, 6, 261-266. [In Russian]
Stepin V.S. (2003). Universal Evolutionism - the Basis of the Modern Scientific Picture of the World. Moscow: Progress-Tradition. [In Russian]
Huntington S. (1994). Clash of Civilizations? Polis, 4, 33-48. [In Russian]
Chikov D.N. (2008). On Institutional Transformations in Modern Russia. Vestnik TSU, 8 (64), 325-329. [In Russian]
Shastitko A.E. (2002). New Institutional Economic Theory. Moscow: Faculty of Economics, Moscow State University, TEIS. [In Russian]
Shpidlik O.T. (2006). Russian Idea: A Different Vision of Man. St. Petersburg: “Izdatelstvo Oleg Obyshko”. [In Russian]
Eisenstadt Sh. (1999). Revolution and the Transformation of Society. Comparative Study of Civilizations. Moscow: Aspect Press. [In Russian]
Yakovlev P.P. (2017). The Trump Effect or the End of Globalization?. Moscow: RUSINS. [In Russian]
Yakovleva N.G. (2023). Human Potential in Light of the Theory of Noonomics: On the Transformation of "Homo Economico" into "Homo Culturalo". Economic Revival of Russia, 4(78), 49-58. [In Russian]
Belloc M., Bowles S. (2012). The persistence of cultural-institutional onventions. https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:sap:wpaper:wp157
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Economic Research Institute Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.
