Institutional environment for tax incentives for technological sovereignty

Authors

Keywords:

institutional environment, taxation, tax incentives, technological sovereignty, critical technology, risk-oriented approach

Abstract

The deepening of geopolitical contradictions and the growing importance of national technological sovereignty predetermine the relevance of the problem of creating a favourable institutional environment for a stimulating tax policy. The article argues that a favourable institutional environment for taxation in general, on the one hand, and for tax incentives for technological development and technological sovereignty, on the other, includes interrelated but different rules and restrictions. While a favourable tax environment in general, by making it easy to pay taxes, contributes to budgetary efficiency and stable economic growth, a favourable institutional environment for tax incentives for technological development adds specific policies, rules, and restrictions that facilitate the processes of tax assistance for innovation and technology. It is reasonable to assume that the further development of such an institutional environment requires the application of a risk-oriented approach to tax incentives, based on the recognition of uncertainty and the objectively high probability of failure inherent in innovation, especially in the field of critical technologies on which sovereignty is based. Among the measures for its implementation, it is recommended to use a “negative tax on R&D” – a financial incentive in the form of a tax credit or tax deduction that reduces the tax liabilities of businesses that invest in research and development, regardless of whether they have profits and income tax liabilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • V. P. Vishnevsky, Financial University

    Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Senior Researcher

References

Scott W.R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://books.google.ru/books?id=mSu3AAAAIAAJ

Crespi F., Caravella S., Menghini M., [et al.] (2021). European Technological Sovereignty: An Emerging Framework for Policy Strategy. Intereconomics, 56, 348-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-021-1013-6

Edler J., Blind K., Kroll H., Schubert T. (2023). Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy. Defining rationales, ends and means. Research Policy, 52(6), 104765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.re-spol.2023.104765

Dementiev V.Е. (2024). Technological Sovereignty and Economic Interests. Journal of Institutional Studies, 16(3), 6-18. [In Russian] https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2024.16.3.006-018

Du Z. (2018). A Literature Review on Institutional Environment and Technological Innovation. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 8, 1941-1950. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2018.89130

Perry K.K. (2020). Innovation, institutions and development: a critical review and grounded heterodox economic analysis of late-industrialising contexts. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 44(2), 391-415. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bez049

He J., Tian X. (2020). Institutions and Innovation. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 12, 377-398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-032820-083433

Wu W., Rui O.M., Wu C. (2013). Institutional environment, ownership and firm taxation. Economics of Transition, 21, 17-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12001

Prianto B.S., Gustofan M. (2022). Institutional environment and tax performance: empirical evidence from developing economies. Public Sector Economics, 46(2), 207-237. https://doi.org/10.3326/pse.46.2.2

Fernández-Rodríguez E., García-Fernández R., Martínez-Arias A. (2021). Business and institutional determinants of Effective Tax Rate in emerging economies. Economic Modelling, 94, 692-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.02.011

Vishnevsky V., Dementiev V. (2010). Innovations, Institutions, and Evolution. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 9, 41-62. [In Russian] https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2010-9-41-62

Barinova N.V. (2020). Innovation Commercialization in Russia and Ways of Overcoming it at the Current Stage of Economy Development. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 2, 32-41. [In Russian] https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2020-2-32-41

Vishnevsky V.P., Makovetsky S.A., Vishnevskaya E.N. (2025). Effects of Geoeconomic Fragmentation: BRICS vs G7. Journal of Applied Economic Research, 24(1), 6-33. [In Russian] https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2025.24.1.001

Balakin M.S. (2025). Improving the mechanism of digital tax control of VAT benefits. Vestnik of Institute of Economic Research, 1(37), 125-139. [In Russian].

Volchik V., Maslyukova E. (2022). Institutional change and Russian innovation system challenges. Terra Economicus, 20(4), 23-44 [in Russian]. https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2022-20-4-23-44

Ponomareva K., Maslov K., Mironova S. (2024). Risk-Based Approach as a Basic Element of the Tax Security of the States in the BRICS Countries. BRICS Law Journal, 11(4), 57-80. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2024-11-4-57-80

Downloads

Published

2026-01-03

Issue

Section

Finance, money circulation and credit

How to Cite

Institutional environment for tax incentives for technological sovereignty. (2026). Economic Research Institute Journal, 40(4(40), 97-111. https://journals.econri.org/index.php/journal/article/view/812