Модель государственного управления качеством жизни населения в Донецкой Народной Республике: региональная версия

В. П. Коваленко

Authors

V. P. Kovalenko SFI «Economic Research Institute»

Keywords:

model, public administration, population life quality, goal-setting schemes, management mechanisms, management tools, feedback

Abstract

The article considers the problem of forming a model of state management of the population life quality in the Donetsk People’s Republic taking into account the urgent task of ensuring that the quality of life in the coming years corresponds to the achieved average level of the subjects of the Russian Federation as a whole. The subject and object of state management of the quality of life of the population are characterized. The latter is presented in the form of its main target components. Particular emphasis is placed on goal-setting as the initial feature of the control action. The proposed model uses one of the schemes of pragmatic goal-setting - the mutual comparison scheme. Attention is also paid to the issue of finding a balance between praxeological and axiological factors of goal-setting. Five types of control actions are presented and the corresponding basic mechanisms for managing the quality of life of the population are characterized. The role of management tools that ensure the functioning of these mechanisms is emphasized. The need to use projects as such tools is noted, which correlates with the recognition of the effectiveness of the project approach in the context of modern strategic challenges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

V. P. Kovalenko, SFI «Economic Research Institute»

Candidate of Sciences in Public Administration, Associate Professor, leading research associate at the Department of Social and Economic Research

References

Okhotsky E.V. (2014). Public administration: towards a modern model of public management. MGIMO Bulletin, 3 (36), 115-127.

Zrilova E.S. (2023). Transformation of the public administration model in the context of geopolitical confrontation and sanctions pressure. Development and security, 3 (19), 20-31. https://doi.org/10.46960/2713-2633_2023_3_20

Adamskaya L.V., Komov V.E. (2021). Regional features of the development of the social sphere. Moscow: Prometheus.

Ilkevich S.V., Shlapak V.S. (2014). Interdisciplinary approach to crisis management: latest trends in foreign studies. Service plus, 1, 51-65.

Smotritskaya I.I., Kozlova S.V. (eds.). (2019). Institutional aspects of improving the quality of public administration in the context of new strategic challenges. Moscow: Institute of Economics RAS.

Irkhin Yu.V. (2017). Efficiency of modern models of public administration. Social and humanitarian knowledge, 3, 27-42.

Atamanchuk G.V. (2008). The essence of civil service: history, theory, law, practice. Moscow: RAGS Publishing House.

Maslov D.V., Dmitriev M.E., Ayvazyan Z.S., Komin M.O. (ed.). (2018). Certain aspects of public administration transformation: processes and quality: analytical review. Moscow: RANEPA. https://www.csr.ru/uploads/2018/02/Gosupravlnie_Web.pdf

Shvets A.B. (2020). The phenomenon of a socio-cultural region in modern socio-geographical studies. Scientific notes of the Crimean Federal University named after V. I. Vernadsky. Geography. Geology, 2, 131-141.

Rossoshansky A.I. (2018). Typology of regions of Russia by indicators of the quality of life of the population. Economic Consultant, 3 (23), 5-9.

Kitova D.A., Kitov A.A. (2020). Economic mentality as a problem of psychological analysis: from theoretical provisions to empirical research. Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology, 4(20), 67-95. http://soc-econom-psychology.ru/engine/documents/document863.pdf

Pasovets Yu.M. (2018). Priority of the components of the quality of life of the population in modern Russian conditions. Bulletin of the Tyumen State University. Social, economic and legal studies, 1, 85-94. https://doi.org/10.21684/2411-7897-2018-4-1-85-94

Kosinsky P.D. (2015). Environmental component of the quality of life of the population: regional aspect. International journal of applied and fundamental research, 6, 484-488.

Tatarkin A.I., Vasilyeva E.V., Chichkanov V.P. (2015). Map of the choice of a mechanism for managing the quality of life of the regional population. Regional economy: theory and practice, 42 (417), 2-14.

Kulazhenkova M.A. (2023). Typology of mechanisms for the formation of target indicators for ensuring the quality of life of the population. Innovative Economy: information, analytics, forecasts, 1, 190-195.

Dzhukha V.M., Saakov A.S. (2014). Systemic stabilization in anti-crisis management as a means of preventing bankruptcy. Management of economic systems: electronic scientific journal, 12 (72), 2. https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_22843412_87987496.pdf

Gudkov E.S. (2023). On state support as a method of state management of the economy in the Russian Federation (organizational and legal aspects). Russian competition law and economics, 1, 22-31. https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2023-1-33-22-31

Kovaltsev G.I. (2015). Feedbacks in the public administration system. Bulletin of the Plekhanov Russian Economic Academy, 5 (83), 112-118.

Kovalenko V.P. (2024). Improvement of control and supervisory activities in modern conditions: a preventive component. Vestnik of Institute of Economic Research, 2 (34), 170-181.

Shchekotin E.V., Goiko V. L., Basina P. A., Bakulin V. V. (2022). Using machine learning to study the quality of life of the population: methodological aspects. Digital sociology, 1, 87-97.

Boev E. I., Zotov V.V., Vasilenko L.A. (2023). Digitalization of public administration: expert reflection of problems and challenges. Digital sociology, 1, 4-12.